Building consumer trust with accurate fungal labelling

Published: 8-Jan-2026

We’ve seen a lot of trade press covering functional fungi in recent weeks. Much of it overcomplicates the very simple issues of accurate labelling terminology and material content transparency, says Skye Chilton (pictured), CEO, Nammex

You need to be a subscriber to read this article.
Click here to find out more.

Contrary to how it was presented in the series of articles from the North American Functional Mushroom Council, the main point of calls for transparency is that the fungal parts must be accurately reflected on the label and in the marketing.1,2

Obviously, fungi are not plants; but, as with plants, different parts can contain varying active compounds that can be scientifically identified and quantified … and therefore confer different benefits.

Proper identification of fungal parts is essential for consumer confidence in this growing category. 

People know what mushrooms are

Allowing the word "mushroom," which is commonly understood among consumers, to be used as an adjective to describe all different fungal parts is a disservice to the entire category and the people who use the products.3

The objection is not to mycelium, which can have functional value separate from that of mushrooms, but to using the word "mushroom" and photos of mushrooms in mycelium labelling and marketing. 

Not yet a Subscriber?

This is a small extract of the full article which is available ONLY to premium content subscribers. Click below to get premium content on Nutraceutical Business Review.

Subscribe now Already a subscriber? Sign in here.

You may also like